Response to: https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-should-not-drop-out-election-prediction-allan-lichtman-2024-7
———
- Brand Worship / Erosion of Trust in Democratic Institutions:
The discussion about Biden vs. potential replacements reflects how political figures are treated almost like "brands" in modern politics. The debate over who would be the best "product" to sell to voters shows how political strategy often mimics marketing strategy. - False Scarcity / Restriction of Voting Rights:
While not directly related to voting rights, the idea of limiting choices to Biden or Harris creates a kind of artificial scarcity of options for voters, potentially manipulating the democratic process. - Household Name / Media Manipulation:
Lichtman's prediction model gaining such prominence demonstrates how certain voices in media can heavily influence public perception and political discourse. - Entertain and Delight / Extreme Political Polarization:
The focus on "keys" and prediction models turns complex political realities into a kind of entertainment, potentially oversimplifying issues and contributing to polarization. - Partner with Big Names / Corporate Influence:
The mention of "war chests" and intra-party support highlights the importance of financial and institutional backing in politics, echoing concerns about corporate influence. - Create False Scarcity / Surveillance and Privacy Concerns:
While not directly related to surveillance, the strategic calculations about when and how to potentially replace a candidate show how political decisions are made based on data and polling, which can involve privacy concerns.
